Signature updates vs BCP

2006-02-01

Aleksander Czarnowski

AVET Information and Network Security, Poland

Editor: Helen Martin

Abstract

Would you ever expect a well established anti-virus company to fail to provide you with signature updates? Would your company's security policy be ready to deal with such a situation?

The full article is available to registered users. Click here for free registration or, if you already are a registered user, login to access the full article.

Magazine


	February 2006 PDF Please register to download the PDF Comment What threats may come News Neighbourhood Watch to fight 'badware' VB2006 call for papers Addendeum: The false positive disaster Malware prevalence report December 2005 Virus analysis Not worthy Technical feature Inside the Windows Meta File format Opinion Learning from Sony: an external perspective Feature Signature updates vs BCP Comparative review VB Comparative: Windows NT 4 Workstation - February 2006 Spam Bulletin Hong Kong proposes anti-spam bill Spammer to pay AOL over $5 million Does Bayesian poisoning exist? See also Virus Bulletin archives How to become a subscriber Reprints

Quick Links

Poll

The Japanese government is reported to have commissioned a 'defensive virus'. Is 'defensive' malware ever a good idea?
Leave a comment
View 11 comments

Malware Prevalence

Autorun
Encrypted/Obfuscated
Heuristic/generic
Sality
Zbot

View this month's full report

Virus Bulletin currently has 224,243 registered users.

Fighting malware and spam

Signature updates vs BCP

Aleksander Czarnowski

PDF

Comment

News

Malware prevalence report

Virus analysis

Technical feature

Opinion

Feature

Comparative review

Spam Bulletin

See also