I-SPY chases SPY-ACT through approval process
Second piece of US anti-spyware legislation given go-ahead.
With the 'Securely Protect Yourself Against Cyber Trespass Act' (aka SPY-ACT act)
approved by a House of Representatives
subcommittee last month, a second set of rules aimed at controlling computer infiltration and data theft is following
it through the lengthy approval process. The 'Internet Spyware Prevention Act' (less successfully trimmed to
'I-SPY act') was approved by a subcommittee on Wednesday.
The SPY-ACT, proposed three years ago by New York Democratic Party representative Edolphus Towns, covers the
implementation of any software which could be put to malicious spying use, and has come under fire for its vague
terms and the likelihood that legitimate programs, particularly advertisers, may be affected its broad coverage.
The bill has twice failed to gain Senate approval and now has a third chance of passing into law, having been
approved by an Energy and Commerce subcommittee in April.
I-SPY, on the other hand, approaches the problem from a different angle, aiming to penalise the malicious or
deceptive use of software, thus giving a freer rein to software and website design as long as it is not put to use
in a fraudulent or duplicitous manner. The bill, put forward in 2004 by Republican Bob Goodlatte of Virginia, is also
on its third passage through congress, having similarly been turned down by the senate on earlier attempts, and
will now go to the House of Representatives for further analysis.
I-SPY includes a list of items considered sensitive data, including names, addresses, credit card details and social
security numbers, attempts to gather which by secretive means would breach the terms of the proposed law.
Like the SPY-ACT, heavy fines and jail terms would be likely sentences for those convicted of cyber-spying.
Details of the competing bills can be found
here or
here, and
some analysis of problems found in the early stages of the legislation process is
here. The US already has several
computer security laws, including at the national level a 2005 anti-phishing law and the famous CAN-SPAM act,
which some have suggested may facilitate spamming by allowing mails which carry genuine source data and
opt-out information. There are also several laws against spyware, phishing and spam at the state level - a useful
summary of current phishing laws can be found
here.
04 May 2007
Tags:
del.icio.us
digg this