Fighting malware and spam

Errata - Windows Server 2003 comparative review

VB regrets that three mistakes crept into the Comparative review published in the November issue.

The mistakes were as follows:

• The version number for Sophos Anti Virus should have read 3.86, not 3.83 as published.
• The values for CAT Quickheal in the standard on-demand test set should have read 'Misses: 169, Detection: 92.91%' in all occurrences (the on access results were erroneously duplicated).
• Norman Virus Control did not reproducibly miss detection of any samples in the In the Wild test set and thus is due a VB100% award.

VB apologises for the errors.

02 December 2004

Tags: virus bulletin   del.icio.us   digg this

Poll

Jobs

• System Administrator (m/f) (Tettnang, Germany)
• Customer Care Tier I (San Diego, California, United States)