Errata - Windows Server 2003 comparative review
VB regrets that three mistakes crept into the Comparative review published in the November issue.
The mistakes were as follows:
- The version number for Sophos Anti Virus should have read 3.86, not 3.83 as published.
- The values for CAT Quickheal in the standard on-demand test set should have read 'Misses: 169, Detection: 92.91%' in all occurrences (the on access results were erroneously duplicated).
-
Norman Virus Control did not reproducibly miss detection of any samples in the In the Wild test set and thus is due a VB100% award.
VB apologises for the errors.
02 December 2004
Tags:
virus bulletin
del.icio.us 
digg this
