Errata - Windows Server 2003 comparative review

VB regrets that three mistakes crept into the Comparative review published in the November issue.

The mistakes were as follows:

  • The version number for Sophos Anti Virus should have read 3.86, not 3.83 as published.
  • The values for CAT Quickheal in the standard on-demand test set should have read 'Misses: 169, Detection: 92.91%' in all occurrences (the on access results were erroneously duplicated).
  • Norman Virus Control did not reproducibly miss detection of any samples in the In the Wild test set and thus is due a VB100% award.

VB100

VB apologises for the errors.

02 December 2004

Tags: virus bulletin   del.icio.us  digg this! digg this


Poll

Should anti-virus software be free for personal use?
Yes
No
I don't know

Leave a comment
View 21 comments

Jobs Career Sidebar

Jobs

In Virus Bulletin's jobs pages among others:
Virus Bulletin currently has 143,006 registered users.