Evaluating anti-virus products with field studies

Fanny Lalonde Lévesque École Polytechnique de Montréal
Carlton R. Davis École Polytechnique de Montréal
José M. Fernandez École Polytechnique de Montréal

The evaluation of anti-virus (AV) products is a vital component in helping the industry develop better products that match the evolving malware threats, and in helping users to make informed decisions about product selection. Traditional evaluation methods involve testing in laboratory environments under various threat scenarios, some more realistic than others. In this paper, we present a first study of an alternative method of product evaluation involving real users. We report on the performance of one AV product in a four-month field study involving 50 users, using their own machines in their normal daily business. In addition, we cross-analyse detection data with user behaviour and demographic characteristics in order to determine what factors are conducive to higher risks of infection. We conclude by discussing options that would allow this methodology to migrate to multi-product evaluations, and become a repeatable and viable alternative to traditional lab-based comparative testing.

 del.icio.us  digg this! digg this

Quick Links

Poll
Do current laws offer enough protection for ethical ('white-hat') hackers?
Yes, the current laws are fine
No, they prevent responsible disclosure of vulnerabilities
The current laws are too lax, we need to be stricter on hacking
I don't know
Leave a comment
View 4 comments

USENIX ATC

VB100 certification
VB100 This month's VB100 comparative on Windows XP brought something of a mixed bag, as several vendors appear to have decreased support for the platform in favour of the newer Windows 8. John Hawes has the full set of results.
See full results.

Virus Bulletin currently has 227,267 registered users.