The (correct) detection of light grey software

Roel Schouwenberg Kaspersky Lab

As brought up in my article in Virus Bulletin (see VB, October 2005, p.6), a new type of 'malicious' software is on the rise which can be considered as 'light grey'.

Since then some of these programs have made the news, with the introduction of the WMF exploit by people wanting to promote their light grey software being the main headliner. Several security vendors have dubbed these programs as adware or spyware, but is this classification actually correct? There is more than meets the eye.

As ICT is evolving we are seeing an increase in requests to detect 'regular' programs, such as Skype for instance, which is known to be almost impossible to block on the network level. What kind of implications does this have? Which way should the AV industry move in order to protect not only its customers but also itself from a legal point of view?

This paper presents a view on these questions, along with some proposed answers.

 del.icio.us  digg this! digg this

Quick Links

Poll
The Japanese government is reported to have commissioned a 'defensive virus'. Is 'defensive' malware ever a good idea?
Yes
No
I don't know
Leave a comment
View 11 comments

99 Subscription Promo

Jobs
In Virus Bulletin's jobs pages among others:

Virus Bulletin currently has 224,243 registered users.