The (correct) detection of light grey software

Roel Schouwenberg Kaspersky Lab

  Corporate stream: Thursday 12 October 2006, 09:40 - 10:20.

As brought up in my article in Virus Bulletin (see VB, October 2005, p.6), a new type of 'malicious' software is on the rise which can be considered as 'light grey'.

Since then some of these programs have made the news, with the introduction of the WMF exploit by people wanting to promote their light grey software being the main headliner. Several security vendors have dubbed these programs as adware or spyware, but is this classification actually correct? There is more than meets the eye.

As ICT is evolving we are seeing an increase in requests to detect 'regular' programs, such as Skype for instance, which is known to be almost impossible to block on the network level. What kind of implications does this have? Which way should the AV industry move in order to protect not only its customers but also itself from a legal point of view?

This paper presents a view on these questions, along with some proposed answers.


Poll

Is it reasonable to teach virus writing as part of a computer security course?
Yes
No
I don't know

Leave a comment
View 7 comments

Jobs Career Sidebar

VB100 certification

VB100 With a new set of samples to measure detection against, a new platform on new hardware and a selection of new products in the mix, John Hawes had his work cut out in this comparative review on Windows XP SP3.
See full results.

Virus Bulletin currently has 133,998 registered users.