Rogue SSL certificates issued for popular websites

Certificates revoked, but browsers still need to be updated.

Comodo, a major vendor of SSL certificates, has admitted to one of its affiliates' servers being hacked, leading to nine rogue SSL certificates for popular domains to be issued.

SSL (secure socket layer) allows for traffic over the Internet that can not be intercepted by intermediates. HTTP over SSL (commonly known as HTTPS) is essential for confidential traffic, such as password and online banking details, between users and websites. More and more websites, including recently Facebook and Twitter, allow for all the traffic to be sent via HTTPS.

However, one of the weaknesses of the protocol is that it does not guarantee that the website is indeed the one it claims to be. That is why a number of trusted organisations, of which Comodo is one, sell certificates that provide proof to the user's browser that communication is happening with the right website.

A hacker trying to re-route traffic attempting to access a certain website (to instead go to a malicious site) - for instance by installing malware on a computer, or by hacking into DNS servers - is significantly more likely to succeed if they can obtain a certificate for the domain. This appears to have happened at Comodo, where certificates were issued for, among others, Google, Yahoo, Skype and Mozilla.

Certificate issuers have the option to revoke certificates and indeed, Comodo did so immediately upon discovering the hack. However, as pointed out by Sophos's Mike Wood in his VB2010 presentation on signatures, most browsers do not check for revoked certificates by default. It is thus both important and understandable that both Microsoft (whose Internet Explorer 9 does have the correct defaults) and Mozilla have released updates that recognize the rogue certificates.

In a statement on its blog, Comodo said the initial attack was performed from an IP address in Iran. While the company acknowledges that this may be a false trail laid by the attacker, it also points out that issuing rogue certificates, combined with re-routing traffic, may be a very useful tool for governments who want to spy on their citizens.

More at Kaspersky's Threatpost blog here and at Sophos's Naked Security blog here.

Tags: , certificates, comodo, iran, ssl. Posted on 24 March 2011 by Virus Bulletin. Leave a comment.

0 comments

 del.icio.us  digg this! digg this

0 comments

Leave a comment

Login to leave a comment

Please login to leave a comment - or click here to register if you are a new user.

Quick Links

Poll
Should software vendors extend support for their products on Windows XP beyond the end-of-life of the operating system?
Yes - it keeps their users secure
No - it encourages users to continue to use a less secure OS
I don't know
Leave a comment
View 24 comments

AusCert2014

Virus Bulletin
In this month's magazine:
  • VBSpam comparative review March 2014
  • VB100 comparative review on Ubuntu Server 12.04LTS
  • The shape of things to come
  • Threat intelligence sharing: tying one hand behind our backs
  • The curse of Necurs, part 1
  • More fast or more dirty?
  • Tofsee botnet
  • Back to VBA
  • Is the security industry up to the new challenges to come?
  • Greetz from academe: No place to Hyde
Virus Bulletin 04 2014
Subscribe now!

Virus Bulletin currently has 231,350 registered users.